Curated by Carsonified

Topics

Learn with Treehouse

Accessibility, CSS3, Design, Django, HTML & CSS, HTML5, JavaScript, jQuery, NoSQL, PHP, Responsive Web Design, Ruby, Ruby on Rails, Tools, UX, Version Control, WordPress, iOS and more

Article 10

You need to be bigger!

By

21 September 2007 | Category: Web Industry

I couldn’t help but laugh when I saw this poster at the airport in Copenhagen:

That’s the myth, isn’t it? Bigger is better, therefore every company should be bigger. Bullshit. Maybe if more companies stayed small and focused on quality, instead of revenue growth, the world would be a better place.

By the way, if you own a business and you can only read one book this year, make sure to pick up a copy of Small Giants: Companies that Choose to be Great Instead of Big

P.S. Before I get torn to pieces in the comments, let me say this: I understand that certain companies need to be big in order to function. Visa is a good example: the more places it’s accepted (which means they need to be bigger to support the business), the better.

Follow @thinkvitamin on Twitter Please check out Treehouse

Other Posts You Might Find Interesting

  • Sorry - No Related Posts Found

Comments

  • Ouebslave

    The man with the hat is sooooo good. Keep the hat on!

  • http://www.clearjanuary.com Mark Caudell

    Companies would be far better smaller and more focused. There’s proof all around us that this is true. Look back at the days of shop owners, butchers, bakers and candlestick makers and see a better business world where it was about skilled people doing specialised work and doing it well. There’s a lot we can learn from the past before we go bounding on into the future.

  • DMC

    Remaining small is a luxury. Nice if you can do it, but most businesses either require or benefit from increased size. Just the way of the world.

  • http://kentriv.com Matt Munsey

    I think a lot of small businesses make the mistake of growing too fast, which causes a lot of problems both in quality of work, as well as infrastructure.

    I think businesses should be prepared to turn down work so that their quality stays high. Just my two cents.

  • http://carsonified.com/biz-tips/can-do-attitude Carsonified! » Blog Archive » Can Do Attitude

    [...] I love posters in Airports becuase they have to convey a simple idea to you very quickly. You’re walking by and the poster has about 1 second to capture your attention, communicate a message and make you remember it. [...]

  • http://www.fourhats.com Jake Liddell

    I think “small is best” over-simplifies the issue.

    It’s no doubt harder to be big and high quality than it is to remain small and high quality. Maybe this is why so many large companies lose their personality, their culture, and their focus.

    Yet, it doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t set ourselves the challenge of growth without losing our pride in our work. It’s not impossible – it’s just difficult. But let’s not let that stop us, eh?!

    On the opposite side of the coin, if you’re making 10% margin while turning over x, and you manage to keep your quality high as you grow to 100x, you can look forward to lots more profit… which has got to be a worthwhile end result, whether you choose to pocket it, spend it on new projects, feed it back into improving the product, spit it with the team, or donate it to good causes…

    Of course, the job you end up doing when you’re running a 100x company might not be your cup of tea. So, either find someone who does want to do it, or throttle the growth consciously – but that’s a nice choice to have to make!

  • http://carsonified.com Ryan Carson

    @Jake Liddell

    It’s no doubt harder to be big and high quality than it is to remain small and high quality.

    I disagree. The hard part is deciding not to grow, even though you could. We’re planning to reach about 20 people as a company. Then that’s it.

    The hard decision will be to stay that small. Anyone can grow bigger.

  • http://www.webtogs.co.uk outdoors girl

    Whilst I think ‘smaller is better’ is just as much of an overgeneralization as ‘bigger is better’, there is definitely some truth in the fact that large groups function less well; studies into evolutionary psychology find that the maximal group size that can function well is around 150 people (e.g. a study by Hill and Dunbar 2003). Too many people and the system becomes disorganized and cannot communicate efficiently.

  • http://tamlyn.org/2007/09/keep-walking/ Tamlyn » Keep Walking

    [...] Just after reading Ryan Carson’s two posts about airport advertising, I was in Johannesburg airport yesterday and noticed these: [...]

  • brij

    I agree small is better as they are the one who deliver the quality then when it choose to go bigger it start diverting from the quality focus to quantity(in terms of clients and product).Also they don’t need very skilled professionals then, recruiting also becomes a number game.How ever i think that a company can be big by staying smaller,the idea is when ever a company start growing it should divide itself in to smaller parts so that the quality remains at par.Off-course this might not hold true for all kind of trades as mention in visa’a example.
    brij
    ====

Badges for Treehouse

Treehouse

Learn iOS, Rails, CSS3, jQuery, Node.js, HTML5, UX and more in less than 8 minutes per day. New videos added regularly. Sign up today and get a free Web Design Toolkit.

Ads Via The Deck

Think Vitamin Radio
Episode #34: Amazon Fire and Responsive Roundtable

Check out our bi-weekly radio show. Covering the hot topics on the web.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Download Podcast as mp3

Advisory Board

The Think Vitamin Advisory Board in place make sure that you receive the best content possible.